EXECUTIVE ORDER IMPOSES SEVERE REPERCUSSIONS ON THOSE ENGAGING IN HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES, CORRUPTION

There are people in our society today who are targeted by rogue factions of our government. They are collectively know as Targeted Individuals. Their lives are minimized and they are physically and mentally tortured. Electronic weapons, similar to those deployed against U.S. diplomats working in Cuba, are used in a covert program to decimate innocent American's lives.

On December 21, 2017 President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order 13818 which targets human rights abuses and corruption. While the order targets foreign criminals, it has far reaching implications. That is because it can be applied to any criminal or organization.
A day of reckoning is here.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-corruption/

THEY ARE REALLY TRYING TO KILL US: INCENTIVES TO PHYSICIANS WHO FULLY VACCINATE CHILDREN

Blue Cross/Blue Shield offers incentives for fully vaccinating 2 year old children. This is despite the lack of studies of the effects on infants and in spite of data suggesting side effects both short and long term. 

It is hard not to see patterns in the various sources of actions that are harmful to us and yet are encouraged by our protectors. Somehow, the discussion of such matters with any of the masses entitles us to a Delusional Disorder diagnosis. We are the disease to be eradicated then. 

https://wellnessandequality.com/tag/blue-cross-blue-shields-physician-incentive-program/

FOLLOW-UP: INCENTIVES TO PHYSICIANS WHO FULLY VACCINATE CHILDREN

I recently posted an article (https://www.facebook.com/Guido.Fawkes.TI/posts/339857939828901) that points out the fact that physician's are paid incentives for vaccinating children. A reader asked me to supply a supporting citation in order to solidify the claims made. This post should provide the support required.

In the linked article, Gina Kolata and Reed Abelson point out that doctor incentives are a part of a growing trend in 2005. Incentives for physicians are in and of themselves not particularly conspiratorial. What is conspiratorial relates to preventative treatments such as vaccines which are not fully tested being forced onto newborns and infants for profit. 

The formulation of vaccines seems like a straight forward process. You put a deactivated virus or bacteria into a person which triggers the autoimmune response and prevents that disease in the future. It's not that simple.

By themselves, the dead virus and bacteria contained in vaccines will not cause the human autoimmune response required to protect it from future infections. In order to illicit that response adjuvants are used. An adjuvant is a substance that increases the immune systems response. Here is a quote from a PubMed.gov article by Tomljenovic L, Shaw CA entitled "Aluminum vaccine adjuvants: are they safe?":


"Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science's understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences. In our opinion, the possibility that vaccine
benefits may have been overrated and the risk of potential adverse effects underestimated, has not been rigorously evaluated in the medical and scientific community. We hope that the present paper will provide a framework for a much needed and long overdue assessment of this highly contentious medical issue." 

(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21568886)

Clearly, the use of Aluminum as an adjuvant is controversial at best within the medical community. So why use it? An even better question is why is there a fanatical effort to vaccinate all newborns and infants with vaccines that contain a possible neurotoxin? One that also is known to cause autoimmune disorders? Why suppress research that questions its use? 

There is enough doubt about the use of Aluminum adjuvants to warrant FULL studies on their safety. However, the lack of full safety studies prior to the wholesale vaccination of everyone including infants with adjuvants that are potentially harmful is premature at best and detrimental at least.

Evidence (which I will not post here) points to rising levels of autoimmune disease and Autism in society. While the proof of links to vaccines containing harmful adjuvants remains to be proven, wouldn't it be prudent to prove their safety before using them? This fundamental lack of commonsense in the safety process amounts to criminality. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/15/business/a-bonus-for-health-payable-to-the-doctor.html

ABOUT THIS BLOG

WHAT DOES CONSPIRACY MEAN?

Today the word conspiracy has attained an unofficial yet persistent meaning associated with those who are mentally ill. However the definition of the word is:

"a secret plan made by two or more people to do something bad, illegal, or against someone’s wishes"
Cambridge University Press 2017

It seems there is some effort to remove the actual meaning of the word and replace it with one which is a denial of the existence of conspiracies. With this blog, I would like to dispel the connotation that conspiracies are only the ramblings of the insane. In truth and in fact, conspiracies are the building blocks of today's world. 

The attempts to squelch any hint of true conspiracies belies the fact that there are laws by which to prosecute them. 

An agreement between two or more people to commit an illegal act, along with an intent to achieve the agreement's goal.  Most U.S. jurisdictions also require an overt act toward furthering the agreement.  An overt act is a statutory requirement, not a constitutional one. See Whitfield v. United States, 453 U.S. 209 (2005). The illegal act is the conspiracy's "target offense."

The Legal Information Institute

CONSPIRACY ON TRIAL

 Conspiracy is a fact of life and occurs every day. In the case Krulewitch v. United States:

Brief Fact Summary. A federal district court indictment charged in three counts that the Petitioner, Krulewitch (Petitioner) and a woman defendant had (1) induced and persuaded another woman to go on October 20, 1941, from New York City to Miami, Florida, for the purpose of prostitution; (2) transported or caused her to be transported from New York to Miami for that purpose and (3) conspired to commit those offenses. Tried alone, the Petitioner was convicted on all three counts of the indictment. The Court of Appeals affirmed.

Other cases of conspiracy include:

Zacarias Moussaoui pleaded guilty to conspiracy in connection with the Sept. 11 attacks. Jose Padilla the Brooklyn-born convert to Islam whom the government once accused of plotting to detonate a “dirty bomb” in the United States, was sentenced to 17 years and 4 months in prison for his role in a conspiracy to help Islamic jihadist fighters abroad. Richard “Dickie” Scruggs, the legendary trial lawyer who made Big Business tremble every time he set foot in court, pleaded guilty to conspiring to bribe a judge. 

Alok Kailashnath Jaiswal, 32, of Azangarh, India, and Rahil Parvez Mir, 25, of Mumbai, India made cold calls to the United States for the purpose of selling versions of pharmaceutical drugs illegal in the United States, including controlled substances, were sentenced in the United States District Court in Abingdon to federal conspiracy charges.

Clearly, conspiracies are common place in the courts. This flies in the face of new definition of the word. Since we know conspiracies are commonplace and are litigated frequently, why are they considered theories? It may be due to the lack of knowledge the average person has about the reality of conspiracies. It is my goal to educate everyone in that case.

WHY I CREATED THIS BLOG

This blog is designed to explore conspiracies. I will supply the best sources for conspiracy claims I make. In most cases they will be government documents, scientific or medical journals. I welcome intellectual discussions of any claims I put forth. On the other hand, I will delete ad hominem attacks and other arguments that lack any supporting information and rely solely on nonsense. 

My reasons for creating this blog are exclusively based on my life. I live a conspiracy theory every day. The details of my experience will be rolled out in the pages of this blog one article at a time. If your life places you in the middle of a conspiracy that you never wanted to be a part of, read on. We may have something in common.