INTRODUCTION
In the movie "Snowden", it was made clear that the CIA/NSA had
systematically infiltrated every countries' communications
infrastructure under the PRISM program in order to surveil their
governments, businesses and citizens. The movie went onto say the
surveillance was indiscriminate, targeting terrorist states along with
friendly countries. The conclusion he arrived at was the surveillance
wasn't about terrorism, it was about control. That observation applied
to the U.S. as well.
Full spectrum, warrantless, dragnet style
surveillance is now in full effect. While there seemed to be restraints
in place to prevent spying on Americans without just cause, in fact,
there were none. This is what Edward Snowden exposed by his leaking of
documents which exposed the activity. In addition, the leaks left egg on
the face of the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, who
lied in front of a congressional committee and the nation that no such
program existed. He resigned amid the fall out of the false testimony he
gave.
It should be noted that Clapper then went onto join the
Center for a New American Security (CNAS), a Washington, DC think tank.
The CNAS' focus include terrorism, irregular warfare, and the national
security implications of natural resource consumption.
FISA SECTION 702
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)[1]
provides Intelligence Agencies authorization to surveil the communications of non-US persons outside the United States.
If you watched the movie "Snowden", you know that Americans within the
United States are surveilled under 702. In order to do this, a warrant
must be approved by a FISA Court judge. However, as stated in the movie,
the FISA Court judges rubber-stamp the warrants.
THE PROTECT AMERICA ACT OF 2007
"The Protect America Act of 2007 (PAA)[2] is a controversial amendment to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Act (FISA) that was signed into law by U.S. President George W. Bush. It
removed the warrant requirement for government surveillance of foreign
intelligence targets "reasonably believed" to be outside the United
States."
"The bill allowed the monitoring of all electronic
communications of "Americans communicating with foreigners who are the
targets of a U.S. terrorism investigation" without a court's order or
oversight, so long as it is not targeted at one particular person
"reasonably believed to be" inside the country."
"The Protect
America Act differed from the FISA in that no discussion of actions or
character judgment of the target was required for application of the
statute (i.e., to receive a FISA surveillance warrant, a FISC foreign
agent definition was required). This data could be monitored only if
intelligence officials acted in the context of intelligence information
gathering.[3]"
"No criminal or terrorism investigation of the
person need be in play at time of the Directive. All that need be
required is that the target be related to an official desire for
intelligence information gathering for actions on part of persons
involved in surveillance to be granted full immunity from U.S. criminal
or civil procedures, under Section 105B(l) of the Act. "
CITATIONS
[1] FISA 702
https://intelligence.house.gov/fisa-702/
[2] Protect America Act of 2007
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protect_America_Act_of_2007…
[3] 'Quasi-anti-terrorism law' for all-forms of intelligence collection
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protect_America_Act_of_2007
There are people in our society today who are targeted by rogue
factions of our government. They are collectively know as Targeted
Individuals. Their lives are minimized and they are physically and
mentally tortured. Electronic weapons, similar to those deployed against
U.S. diplomats working in Cuba, are used in a covert program to
decimate innocent American's lives.
On December
21, 2017 President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order 13818 which
targets human rights abuses and corruption. While the order targets
foreign criminals, it has far reaching implications. That is because it
can be applied to any criminal or organization.
A day of reckoning is here.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-corruption/
I recently posted an article (https://www.facebook.com/Guido.Fawkes.TI/posts/339857939828901)
that points out the fact that physician's are paid incentives for
vaccinating children. A reader asked me to supply a supporting citation
in order to solidify the claims made. This post should provide the
support required.
In the linked article, Gina Kolata and Reed
Abelson point out that doctor incentives are a part of a growing trend
in 2005. Incentives for physicians are in and of themselves not
particularly conspiratorial. What is conspiratorial relates to
preventative treatments such as vaccines which are not fully tested
being forced onto newborns and infants for profit.
The
formulation of vaccines seems like a straight forward process. You put a
deactivated virus or bacteria into a person which triggers the
autoimmune response and prevents that disease in the future. It's not
that simple.
By themselves, the dead virus and bacteria
contained in vaccines will not cause the human autoimmune response
required to protect it from future infections. In order to illicit that
response adjuvants are used. An adjuvant is a substance that increases
the immune systems response. Here is a quote from a PubMed.gov article by Tomljenovic L, Shaw CA entitled "Aluminum vaccine adjuvants: are they safe?":
"Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most
commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread
use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science's understanding about their
mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a
concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these
compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is
safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however,
clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious
immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant
form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and
associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and
widespread adverse health consequences. In our opinion, the possibility
that vaccine
benefits may have been overrated and the risk of
potential adverse effects underestimated, has not been rigorously
evaluated in the medical and scientific community. We hope that the
present paper will provide a framework for a much needed and long
overdue assessment of this highly contentious medical issue."
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21568886)
Clearly, the use of Aluminum as an adjuvant is controversial at best
within the medical community. So why use it? An even better question is
why is there a fanatical effort to vaccinate all newborns and infants
with vaccines that contain a possible neurotoxin? One that also is known
to cause autoimmune disorders? Why suppress research that questions its
use?
There is enough doubt about the use of Aluminum adjuvants
to warrant FULL studies on their safety. However, the lack of full
safety studies prior to the wholesale vaccination of everyone including
infants with adjuvants that are potentially harmful is premature at best
and detrimental at least.
Evidence (which I will not post here)
points to rising levels of autoimmune disease and Autism in society.
While the proof of links to vaccines containing harmful adjuvants
remains to be proven, wouldn't it be prudent to prove their safety
before using them? This fundamental lack of commonsense in the safety
process amounts to criminality.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/15/business/a-bonus-for-health-payable-to-the-doctor.html
Many of my fellow TIs tend to engage in following the path of
supernatural explanations and theories for the torture we experience. I
have always maintained it is better to stay based in reality and science
for answers.
If someone releases an odorless, invisible gas
into the air near you that then causes you to experience hallucinations,
there are several ways to approach the search for causation. One is a
scientific approach. You assume nothing and question everything then use
what can be explained, disregarding what cannot. You eliminate food and
drink as the culprits. You then move to the next likely possibility,
the air you breathe. While you may or may not have the ability to
analyze the air, you consider it a possibility. While you may not arrive
at a conclusive answer, you have a reality-based source which, with the
right equipment, be tested. Past uses of gases can be researched as
proof the gas exists and has been used.
Another approach is
examine non-scientific sources. These are endless and there is no test
to rule them out. They are also likely to be discarded by most people in
society. Some of these explanations include: God, aliens, magic, earth
spirits, inter-dimensional beings, demons, angels, secret societies,
ghosts, monsters, and others. The downside of these belief systems is
the cannot be verified. They require a huge leap in faith for other
members in society to believe. Taking this to government officials will
likely lead to a stay in a mental institution.
The path you
choose is your own. However, do not be fooled into believing that it
doesn't affect anyone else. As TIs we are viewed by the public as insane
regardless of the scientific facts and past abuses by governments,
groups, and individuals. Disinformation and propaganda are being used to
reinforce the insanity stigma. If fully one third of us are claiming
they are being tortured by ghosts and aliens, what effect does this have
on the 70% of us that are attempting to expose the reality-based
sources of our torture?
The answer is that the organized
disinformation army will always point to those claiming fantastic
sources as indicative of our entire population. In the final analysis,
these claims injure any attempts to bring attention and exposure for
these very real crimes. While we cannot eliminate those who will believe
in the supernatural or the paid disinformation actors, I feel we need
to minimize their effects. We need a galvanizing plan to move those
willing to listen to reason to see the benefits of reality-based,
scientific and evidentiary claims. This moves our cause forward.
Failure to streamline our demographic into acceptability in the eyes of
public opinion will relegate us to the category of urban myth and worse
yet, the appearance we are a large group of insane people.
The
featured article entitled "The Octopus" details some of the operations
that fund the torture we experience. David Guayatt states:
"An
introduction to the involvement of senior US politicians, bureaucrats
and the CIA in globalized criminal activities, the investigation of
which cost investigative reported Danny Casolaro his life."
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Document:The_Octopus
I feel obligated to let my fellow American's see what the agents are up to with our tax dollars. Investing for their own profit! My heroes?
More good news from your favorite government and mine. They just keep
trying to sneak this stuff past us. Maybe they think we're sheeple.
Many of my fellow TIs tend to engage in following the path of
supernatural explanations and theories for the torture we experience. I
have always maintained it is better to stay based in reality and science
for answers. 