THE INTELLIGENCE BLACK BUDGET: MONEY FOR NOTHING

Intelligence agencies have a 52.6 billion dollar Black Budget to draw on which they do not need to account for. Maybe if that were the end of this story I wouldn't need to make this post. However, they also have access to billions more through their own Venture Capital firms, illicit drug sales, and other business ventures. As with the Black Budget, they are not required to report profits. The topic goes much deeper than this and there is scant room for the details here. I feel if they want to work against the interests of the American people they should completely fund their own operations. Without any accountability or oversight, they shouldn't be trusted with our money.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/national/black-budget/

AR 2-2: THE DOCUMENT THAT GOVERNS THE CONDUCT OF THE CIA (IN THE UNITED STATES)

The current debate about government surveillance has largely overlooked the CIA, possibly because we know little about the agency's activities within the United States. While the relevant legal authorities governing the CIA, including Executive Order 12333, set out the CIA's mandate, they do so in broad terms. Beyond the generalities in EO 12333 and other laws, the public has had few opportunities to examine the rules governing the CIA's activities. 

The Most Important Surveillance Order We Know Almost Nothing About.

But we know more today than we did a few weeks ago. In response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the ACLU and Yale Law School's Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic, the CIA has released a slew of documents concerning CIA surveillance under EO 12333. (The Justice Department has also recently released a set of documents related to the executive order.)

The national debate in the 1970s about the proper limits of U.S. government spying on its own citizens was, to a large extent, about the CIA. In the wake of the Watergate scandal and news stories about other illegal CIA activity, President Gerald Ford and Congress launched investigations into the full range of CIA misdeeds — from domestic spying programs and infiltration of leftist organizations to experimentation on non-consenting human subjects and attempts to assassinate foreign leaders.

Although the CIA's legal authority to spy on Americans was very narrow, these investigative committees — chaired by Sen. Frank Church, Vice President Nelson Rockefeller, and Rep. Otis Pike — discovered that the CIA had engaged in a massive domestic spying project, "Operation CHAOS," which targeted anti-war activists and political dissenters. The committee reports also revealed that, for more than 20 years, the CIA had indiscriminately intercepted and opened hundreds of thousands of Americans' letters. In addition to documenting the intelligence agencies' extensive violations of the law, the Church Committee concluded that the constitutional system of checks and balances "has not adequately controlled intelligence activities."
The Church Committee's conclusion — at core, an admonition — still resonates today. While the documents that the CIA has released are heavily redacted, raising more questions than they answer, they strongly suggest that the agency's domestic activities are extensive.

Some highlights from the documents:

A key CIA regulation — titled "AR 2-2" — governs the conduct of the CIA's activities, which include domestic intelligence collection.
AR 2-2, which has never been publicly released before, includes rules governing a wide range of activities, including surveillance of U.S. persons, human experimentation, contracts with academic institutions, relations with journalists and staff of U.S. news media, and relations with clergy and missionaries.

Several annexes to AR 2-2 contain the agency's EO 12333 implementing procedures. For example, Annex A, "Guidance for CIA Activities Outside the United States," sets forth the procedures that apply to CIA activity directed toward U.S. citizens and permanent residents who are abroad. Much of the relevant information is redacted. Annex F, "Procedures Governing Conduct and Coordination by CIA and DEA of Narcotics Activities Abroad," is similarly redacted in key sections, including the section discussing the agencies' "Specific Agreement Concerning Electronic Surveillance."

The documents indicate that the CIA engages in a wide array of domestic activity, often in conjunction with the FBI.

https://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/privacy-and-surveillance/new-docs-raise-questions-about-cia-spying-here-home?page=1&redirect=blog/speak-freely/new-docs-raise-questions-about-cia-spying-here-home#comments-topblog-cia-500x280-v02.jpg

(C)RIME (I)NSIDE (A)MERICA: CIA AGENT ARRESTED IN DRUG BUST

I feel obligated to let my fellow American's see what the agents are up to with our tax dollars. Investing for their own profit! My heroes?

BTW, FaceBook suspended me for this post. While this link is to High Times the same story was reported by:

CBS News
The Navy Times
Military.COM 

The government issue Artificial Intelligence censorship program FB is using seems to flag any anti-government content. Is FaceBook the next invasive government agency?

A BRAIN IMPLANT VICTIM SPEAKS OUT

I posted a link one year ago. I received a comment on the link authored by H. Michael Sweeney (HMS) which I feel I need to share again as it contains some very sound advice. HMS outlines some of the pitfalls many TIs fall into. My take away is we are constantly being fed false information, whether deliberately or inadvertently. Information which is isn't cited from a credible source needs to be vetted thoroughly. There is an entire disinformation system designed control what TIs believe. 

***BEGIN HMS COMMENT===

It is too bad this information had not been buried so long because of the language barriers and international separation. To my knowledge this is only the second time this level of quality of information has surfaced (and I apologize but I am unable to reference the other as the information has been lost to me). 

The images give vivid support to the Naeslund testimony. The nature of the additional story material appears to be confirming by their conformity, also useful. 

*** But I have a concern that TIs do not free associate their own state of affairs with presentation content, such that they come away convinced they are also such a victim === 

While it is certainly possible any given TI has an implant of similar nature, it is less likely rather than more. There are newer methods which do not require implants for many of the symptoms cited, though it is also true that there are also newer implants with greater capabilities and additional symptoms. 

*** However, I caution readers of the material to keep one thing in mind: in the face of the continuing medical community's reluctance to address implants (won't scan for them, won't remove them, won't talk about them) we are forced to rely upon account summations which are based primarily upon the victim's perceptions. The problem with that, in my experience and especially with long-term victims, their belief structures have been formed, in part, by the deliberate inclusion of 'false clues' within the targeting process. === 

The intent is to make the victim believe several false things, key things about aspects of and the nature of their targeting. This in turn accomplishes several things: the victim defends against the wrong enemy/technology/source of attack, resulting in frustration (you can't defeat the right problem fighting against the wrong problem); the victim appears mental to outside observers (esp. anyone from whom help is sought); it generates natural paranoiac responses useful to that same end. 

*** It also forces the victim, in trying to understand and present their circumstance in summation, to need reliance upon books and printed materials by other persons. The risk there, is that such sources may be deliberate or misguided misinformation, often tainted once more by false belief structures. The quality of the material being cited can only be judged by the quality and veracity of source references. This is true of all books, of course, not just those on mind control. Being written in a book is no proof of validity; anyone can get a book into print, especially if the intent of those behind MC to provide disinformation. The point is this: a quote from such a book is only as valuable as the YOUR assessment of the entire book or the author. 

*** My concerns stem primarily from subtle clues that not all the information as presented is valid or true. No one clue is a smoking gun, and could easily have an innocent explanation, even as simple as a poorly worded sentence. So I urge caution when comparing this material to one's own situation. It would be tragic to come away with a wrong conclusion. 

Implants remain the hardest enemy technology to deal with effectively. It serves no purpose to anyone but perps for a victim to falsely conclude they are implanted. I add to this concern, that there have been scumbags who have used gadget meters to 'find' implants in people for a fee which can be triggered to give a false signal by simply moving one's finger an inch while holding it, to do so. The kind of devices capable of reliably finding a variety of implants are not going to be hand held toys, as most implants are passive (think dormant) and do not transmit signals except on command, precisely for the reason of avoiding easy detection.

***END HMS COMMENT===

This is a link to the original article:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_mindcon29.htm

THE PHOENIX PROGRAM: STARTLING SIMILARITIES TO GANGSTALKING PROGRAMS

The Phoenix Program, initiated in 1965, was a mass assassination operation spearheaded by the CIA during the Viet Nam War. A former CIA operative in the Phoenix program interviewed in the linked video called it a "...computerized genocide program." As the video further points out, a database of Viet Nam citizens was used to select 1,800 of them a month for extermination. The extermination program was then used by some to eliminate their rivals through the use of a "See Something, Say Something" type program, reporting their neighbors as suspected Viet Cong (VC) to U.S. forces for money. Many innocent people died. The CIA operatives collected the ears of the dead to prove they had killed people

In order to recruit people to be Bounty Hunters the CIA appealed to the candidate's sense of patriotism, informing them they were fighting communism to protect the American way of life. The situation they found on the ground diverged vastly from what they were prepared to expect. The new recruits were ordered to kill anyone on the computer generated list regardless of their complicity with the VC. The stark contradiction between what they learned during training and the reality of situation they found themselves in disillusioned many. After the war, many of these bounty hunters who returned home were unable to assimilate back into normal society due to their part in the slaughter of innocent people. Still others who had enjoyed their work during the war became mercenaries. 

We are now seeing a resurgence in the use of Bounty Hunters and computer generated lists of "suspected" [insert a label here]. The same system of snitching and murder is in place and is abused by criminals and profiteers alike. In an effort to keep the program hidden from those not involved, targets are driven to suicide through the use of silent weapons which slowly disintegrate the target's life.

The CIA uses various agencies to manage the disintegration program. The Department of Homeland Security, NSA, FBI, Local Law Enforcement, and the Military are primary assets. The community a target lives is recruited into the program by local police. The other assets attach to local police departments in order to circumnavigate laws forbidding the use of the military against citizens on U.S. soil. Doing so would be a war crime, crime against humanity, and treason.

The obvious question is "why?" Why would a government hunt down and kill its own people? This question has more than one answer. On the surface, it appears that people have been labeled as Domestic Terrorists, and are therefore traitors, enemies of the state. However the truth is far less simple. 

There are financial incentives for all of the participants in the program. Revenue streams include: Raiding the target's UCC1 account, Medical/Psychological/Weapons testing and experimentation, government grants and contracts, research and development budgets, the black budget, illegal drug sales, false flag operations, and other criminal activities. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOmQoADOQWs&t=1208s

EXECUTIVE ORDER IMPOSES SEVERE REPERCUSSIONS ON THOSE ENGAGING IN HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES, CORRUPTION

There are people in our society today who are targeted by rogue factions of our government. They are collectively know as Targeted Individuals. Their lives are minimized and they are physically and mentally tortured. Electronic weapons, similar to those deployed against U.S. diplomats working in Cuba, are used in a covert program to decimate innocent American's lives.

On December 21, 2017 President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order 13818 which targets human rights abuses and corruption. While the order targets foreign criminals, it has far reaching implications. That is because it can be applied to any criminal or organization.
A day of reckoning is here.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-corruption/

RETURN TO THE DARK AGES

“The Constitution is a limitation of the government, not on private individuals--that it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government--that it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizens' protection against the government."

"Instead of being a protector of man's rights, the government is becoming their most dangerous violator; instead of guarding freedom, the government is establishing slavery; instead of protecting men from the initiators of physical force, the government is initiating physical force and coercion in any manner and issue it pleases; instead of serving as the instrument of objectivity in human relationships, the government is creating a deadly, subterranean reign of uncertainty and fear, by means of nonobjective laws whose interpretation is left to the arbitrary decisions of random bureaucrats; instead of protecting men from injury by whim, the government is arrogating to itself the power of unlimited whim--so that we are fast approaching the stage of ultimate inversion; the stage where the government is "free" to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may only act by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of humanity, the stage of rule by brute force.”

― Ayn Rand, The Virtue of Selfishness: A New Concept of Egoism, 1964

HR 4760: WE WILL ALL BE CHIPPED (WE ALREADY ARE)

More good news from your favorite government and mine. They just keep trying to sneak this stuff past us. Maybe they think we're sheeple.

https://www.activistpost.com/2018/01/congress-quietly-pushing-bill-require-national-biometric-id-americans.html

TODAY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DISPENSES JUSTICE

As with most technological advances employed by our government to control us, the decision to use artificial intelligence to determine whether or not we should be incarcerated has been kept from us. This article points out how important judgements are being delegated to Artificial Intelligence. As the author points out, based on decades of racist data.

In an attempt to the improve processes involved in making such determinations the government has made an epic error. Perhaps intentionally so. They designed an automated system that analyzes data to determine probabilities. However, the foundation of the process is based on biased data. The failure to fix the data is likely based on the cost of fixing it. The choice to move forward with an AI judge under these circumstances simply perpetuates racist policies concerning incarceration.

There are other issues to be examined. The most important is the decision to automate the justice system. Another pressing concern is the decision not to inform the people of this country that our lives will be placed in the hands of a computer. If this issue doesn't rise to the level of public information, what else aren't they telling us?

http://www.newsweek.com/ai-racist-yet-computer-algorithms-are-helping-decide-court-cases-789296

OUR LIBERTY TO PRIVATE THOUGHT IS NOW BEING LITIGATED

If you read my page you are aware of technology that has the ability to see what you are thinking and to change how you think. It is actually far deeper than that, but this conveys the concept. Of course, society and the system completely deny that any of this is possible or that the Military Industrial Complex, Intelligence Agencies, or the Department of Homeland Security would target people for testing, profit, revenge, or any other reason. The system is corrupt and these organizations engage in illegal activity without care or restraint.

The Featured Article dispels the cover-up. It is very clear that the science, government and medical communities are discussing the topic right now. Specifically, they are discussing under what set of circumstances they can justify bypassing you as a person with inherent rights in order to directly interface with your brain. Interface with it in order to access your memories, monitor your thoughts and modify how you think.

It strikes me how presumptuous it is to have this conversation without us. Under what authority do they claim they have the right to do this under any circumstances? As all Targeted Individuals know, they've been doing this for a long time covertly. Now they want to peer into everyone's soul. This a tool for tyrants and psychopaths. Only a sick and twisted authoritarian of the highest magnitude would even consider doing this. Which leads us right back to the Department of Homeland Security.

If you only read one article today, read this one. This article is the herald of what is to come and hints at what has been covertly been done since the 1940's. Is it too late to scrap the current government and the systems that support it so we can start over?

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/preserving-the-right-to-cognitive-liberty/

TERRORISM LIAISON OFFICERS: COURSE OUTLINE

The Terrorism Liaison Officer (TLO) is a local government First Responder who acts as the eyes and ears of the Department of Homeland Security through FUSION Centers or other data collection and processing hubs. These data centers are the place where other entities loosely attached to local law enforcement operate behind the scenes.

According to the TLO Course Outline:

"The Terrorism Liaison Officer (TLO) is designed to be a nationally interconnected program of designated law enforcement officers, firefighters, military, and other first responders that attend an approved and accredited course of instruction. This shared learning experience prepares the TLOs to fill a specific role within their organization as a link or “liaison.”

The outline goes onto to state: 

“...utilize the Terrorism Liaison Officer (TLO) Program to foster communication and collaboration among the fire service; law enforcement; the federal homeland security and intelligence communities and public safety stakeholders. The TLOs serve as the conduit through which homeland security and crime-related information flows from the field to the Fusion Center for assessment and analysis." 

To sum it up, local first responders work directly with DHS components, and, by proxy, the military, including the intelligence community (CIA, NSA, DIA, FBI, DARPA, et al.), in order to share information on criminal activity. Criminal activity.

As I am writing this post, several questions come to mind. Should the reader feel they have the answers to my inquiries, please enlighten me.

1. The attacks on 9-11 spurred a frenzy of freedom crushing laws and policies that were supposed to target terrorists. When did the focus change to ANY crime committed?
2. Why is the government using military and intelligence resources to fight common crime?
3. Why are laws designed to prevent the use of military forces on the people being disregarded?

Part of the answer lies in the numerous false flag operations that have occurred since shortly before 9-11. The desired result of those operations was to create fear and division. Fear so we won't question the use of the military against us and division to keep us from rising against the government. The false flags and other misleading activities such as state sponsored propaganda, have steered this country and its people to our current situation. Looking back and comparing where we were to where we are, a distinct picture emerges of a progression towards a society where the government uses the full force of the military and police on the citizens in order to further its own agenda.

I love my country. My corrupt government is an embarrassment. In its death throes, it intends to squeeze every penny from us through criminal enterprises. The military is now free to do as it please and it does. They are secretly hoarding new technology which is unregulated. Much of this technology has been weaponized and being deployed against the people covertly. 

https://publicintelligence.net/terrorism-liaison-officer-tlo-program/