I posted a link one year ago. I received a comment on the link authored
by H. Michael Sweeney (HMS) which I feel I need to share again as it
contains some very sound advice. HMS outlines some of the pitfalls many
TIs fall into. My take away is we are constantly being fed false
information, whether deliberately or inadvertently. Information which
is isn't cited from a credible source needs to be vetted thoroughly.
There is an entire disinformation system designed control what TIs
believe. ***BEGIN HMS COMMENT===
It is too bad this information had not been buried so long because of the language barriers and international separation. To my knowledge this is only the second time this level of quality of information has surfaced (and I apologize but I am unable to reference the other as the information has been lost to me).
The images give vivid support to the Naeslund testimony. The nature of the additional story material appears to be confirming by their conformity, also useful.
*** But I have a concern that TIs do not free associate their own state of affairs with presentation content, such that they come away convinced they are also such a victim ===
While it is certainly possible any given TI has an implant of similar nature, it is less likely rather than more. There are newer methods which do not require implants for many of the symptoms cited, though it is also true that there are also newer implants with greater capabilities and additional symptoms.
*** However, I caution readers of the material to keep one thing in mind: in the face of the continuing medical community's reluctance to address implants (won't scan for them, won't remove them, won't talk about them) we are forced to rely upon account summations which are based primarily upon the victim's perceptions. The problem with that, in my experience and especially with long-term victims, their belief structures have been formed, in part, by the deliberate inclusion of 'false clues' within the targeting process. ===
The intent is to make the victim believe several false things, key things about aspects of and the nature of their targeting. This in turn accomplishes several things: the victim defends against the wrong enemy/technology/source of attack, resulting in frustration (you can't defeat the right problem fighting against the wrong problem); the victim appears mental to outside observers (esp. anyone from whom help is sought); it generates natural paranoiac responses useful to that same end.
*** It also forces the victim, in trying to understand and present their circumstance in summation, to need reliance upon books and printed materials by other persons. The risk there, is that such sources may be deliberate or misguided misinformation, often tainted once more by false belief structures. The quality of the material being cited can only be judged by the quality and veracity of source references. This is true of all books, of course, not just those on mind control. Being written in a book is no proof of validity; anyone can get a book into print, especially if the intent of those behind MC to provide disinformation. The point is this: a quote from such a book is only as valuable as the YOUR assessment of the entire book or the author.
*** My concerns stem primarily from subtle clues that not all the information as presented is valid or true. No one clue is a smoking gun, and could easily have an innocent explanation, even as simple as a poorly worded sentence. So I urge caution when comparing this material to one's own situation. It would be tragic to come away with a wrong conclusion.
Implants remain the hardest enemy technology to deal with effectively. It serves no purpose to anyone but perps for a victim to falsely conclude they are implanted. I add to this concern, that there have been scumbags who have used gadget meters to 'find' implants in people for a fee which can be triggered to give a false signal by simply moving one's finger an inch while holding it, to do so. The kind of devices capable of reliably finding a variety of implants are not going to be hand held toys, as most implants are passive (think dormant) and do not transmit signals except on command, precisely for the reason of avoiding easy detection.
***END HMS COMMENT===
This is a link to the original article:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_mindcon29.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment